A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national consideration subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, notably in a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal scheduling disputes, the place sights of The ocean are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic initiatives via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waist-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the drinking water throughout extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined intimately because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main on the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for your problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.